sounds coolXenon said:I was thinking of trying to work into a board to rate members on the educational value of their posts and have them go up in group that way? How does this sound?
hm, im not sure, can you give me more info....need to be briefed before executing a decisionXenon said:I was thinking of trying to work into a board to rate members on the educational value of their posts and have them go up in group that way? How does this sound?
Yeah, but you know in the end if people want to 'seem' educational by their posts all they have to do is rate themselves and have their friends do so too.Xenon said:You will be able to rate posts based on quality and thoughful information. The people with high ratings will have the most "expert points", therefor fixing the problem of people looking at the skulls as the only means of determining who is the "expert" fish keepers.
Again with my point earlier--who's to say whats quality and whats not. Your basing it soley on opinion, which isnt very liable.BDKing57 said:how about just checking a post that is useful. Instead of having a rated post that would eventually end in the post whores resorting to downvoting, you would get bonus points of have a different column for a quality post. Its either a quality post or it isnt though, no rating.