Joined
·
1,190 Posts
Someone help me identify these critters. Im not positive but think that they came from smelt I caught from the columbia river. They are flat in appearance and cling on the piranhas body.


it has been identified - look in the desiese and paracites forumpcrose said:yeah ask Frank he will tell you, that looks weird.
That's not exactly what I said Innes:Innes Posted on Apr 19 2003, 03:26 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE (pcrose @ Apr 19 2003, 08:05 AM)
yeah ask Frank he will tell you, that looks weird.
it has been identified - look in the desiese and paracites forum
That does not mean it is an ID confirmed by me. There could be other types of copepods that could fit that organism, but that parasite-like pest could be something else. So I listed the more common one so that he had something to go on.hastatus Posted: Apr 19 2003, 06:31 AM
I sent you an email w/image included. What it looks like to me is argulus.
sorry, but I also thought it was the paracite that you saidhastatus said:That's not exactly what I said Innes:Innes Posted on Apr 19 2003, 03:26 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE (pcrose @ Apr 19 2003, 08:05 AM)
yeah ask Frank he will tell you, that looks weird.
it has been identified - look in the desiese and paracites forum
That does not mean it is an ID confirmed by me. There could be other types of copepods that could fit that organism, but that parasite-like pest could be something else. So I listed the more common one so that he had something to go on.hastatus Posted: Apr 19 2003, 06:31 AM
I sent you an email w/image included. What it looks like to me is argulus.
Interesting, does seem that is what you wrote here:Innes Posted on Apr 19 2003, 11:59 PM ....sorry, but I also thought it was the paracite that you said
and I didn't say that it was you that IDed it
Seem pretty self-evident to me, unless you mean that you identified it? In which case, your ID may be completely off because there are also host specific parasites common to P. cariba that have not been looked it. Argulus was only a quick look see. Since Hollywood has the parasite there he can confirm its appearance or not. If it is not the same appearing, then we can dig deeper.Innes Posted on Apr 19 2003, 03:26 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it has been identified - look in the desiese and paracites forum
Yes you did do well for repeating the information I had already posted. So credit is given you.Innes Posted on Apr 20 2003, 02:51 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Frank I am no expert, but I do try and help.
I think here I did pretty well if I do say so myself, and I an sorry if I was redundant.
Frank I didn't copy you, I don't copy people - I look at things myself and make up my own mind.hastatus said:Yes you did do well for repeating the information I had already posted. So credit is given you.Innes Posted on Apr 20 2003, 02:51 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Frank I am no expert, but I do try and help.
I think here I did pretty well if I do say so myself, and I an sorry if I was redundant.
Innes, first of all; I don't just find things. That link has been at my OPEFE web site since 1996. Secondly, I don't use web searches since my contacts include Dr. Earl Weidner and Dr. Robert Goldstein both well-known and published parasitologist. Bob Goldstein, as you probably don't know since you mention my web site is to difficult for you to navigate was helpful to me and Oregonians in his written testimony showing pirana parasites would not transfect native fishes. Earl not only has written many scientific papers on parasites, but I have also contributed specimens of neon tetras for his examination. Point is, I rarely have to search out anything on any web site for information in relations to diseases/parasites.Innes Posted on Apr 20 2003, 11:16 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE (hastatus @ Apr 19 2003, 08:31 PM)
QUOTE
Innes Posted on Apr 20 2003, 02:51 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Frank I am no expert, but I do try and help.
I think here I did pretty well if I do say so myself, and I an sorry if I was redundant.
Yes you did do well for repeating the information I had already posted. So credit is given you.
Frank I didn't copy you, I don't copy people - I look at things myself and make up my own mind.
Just because you also found that informative site with the paracite on it, doesn't mean for one minute that I took it from you.
to be honest I can't find anything on OPEFE - so I never look, I have been a few times and it is too much science for me, and very hard to navigate for people who are not "in the know" like myself.
I also linked to a post of mine from ages ago with a link containing info on loads of paracites (well the same site really, but a differanpart of it), hopefully this might serve as some evidance that I did not take this info from you just to look good and take your credit.
I found that site when I was looking up the same thing for Marco, as he had described something simelar a while ago.
and yes you did post the pic from that site, but as soon as I saw the pic from Hollywood - great work Hollywood on providing a pic by the way - I knew what I was going to say, even before I scrolled down and saw your post.
but if you want to think I want to copy your comments and advice --->you are welcome to that thought
and if it does make you feel better I do learn much from you, I just don't copy it in the next post - thats not my style
.I just don't copy it in the next post - thats not my style
. Sorry, ego is not in my post, it is clearly my view that you simply repeated information below my post for whatever reason.and if it does make you feel better I do learn much from you
Only to the fish.Innes Posted on Apr 20 2003, 04:19 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK this is messy enough
That pic closely resembles the parasite. Heres another note to add -- the parasite only exist in my yellow natt (ternetzi shoal). On two occassions Ive fed it large goldfish however I also fed the other tanks GF from that same batch. No parasite on either caribe or natt tank.hastatus said:Hollywood, here is another photo, parasite (fish louse) common to fw native fish.