Joined
·
251 Posts
I've had this guy for a little over a year and a half. he's about 2 years old now. almost 4". is he a rhom? he's pretty active and aggressive. here are some pix from beginning to now. thanks guys.
I'll answer it this way, some subadult Serrasalmus rhombeus have a dark "V" at the caudal and a faint band at the tail until past subadult. The compressus group, in particular S. altuvei can have a dark "V" at small sizes later grow out and have a dark band just like S. rhombeus. Pristobrycon can have both a dark "V" and a terminal band depending where they are in age. Its very interchangeable. That's why some compressus group fishes are mistaken for S. marginatus which predominately has a dark "V" throughout its life until maturity when the tail darkens nearly completely to just a hyaline edge (like S. maculatus). ON his photos, I'm thrown by the added photos of what appears to be a Pristobrycon.Judazzz Posted Today, 12:14 PM
Looks like that fish has a "Manueli-style" caudal fin - no dark terminal band and a prominent V at the base.
I thought Rhoms had more Nattereri-like tails, dark terminal band and base, without the distinct V-shape (I know, the comparisons are hardly scientific, if at all, but it's the easiest way to compare, imo.)
Could it be because of the size of the fish - 4" for a 2-year old Rhom doesn't seem much to me...
Or am I just way off?
One last thing, Antonio Machado when he revised the genus/species of S. eigenmanni made a remark that this species confused him because of the ontogeny, meaning the strong resemblence to a Serrasalmus species (rhomboid body, pointy snout) to later developing into a Pristobrycon appearance (small snout, laterally compress body).Judazzz Posted Today, 12:45 PM
Aaah, I see...
Thanks for clearing that up, Frank
oh, now you come aroundhastatus said:One last thing, Antonio Machado when he revised the genus/species of S. eigenmanni made a remark that this species confused him because of the ontogeny, meaning the strong resemblence to a Serrasalmus species (rhomboid body, pointy snout) to later developing into a Pristobrycon appearance (small snout, laterally compress body).
[snapback]851096[/snapback]
PiranhaMaster Feb 9 2004, 10:14 AM
ok, first it is way too small for an ID but that being said it does not appear to be S.Rhombeus at this time. There are many varients of S.Rhombeus so only time will tell. By just looking at this very small specimen with rounded snout and very large eye I am going to GUESS that it is in the Pristobrycon Genus. Possible eigenmanni. Again at this stage in it's development there is no way to be certain and may infact look completely different with another inch or two added.
Does yours look just like this one? and is yours the same size at 6 months? That is a very slow growth rate for any P no matter what type it is. There are no tell tail signs at this stage to make any possitive ID. I only notice the eye and snout as not looking like a typical S.Rhom.
hastatus Feb 9 2004, 10:33 AM
S. rhombeus. As to type of locality fish is from, can't say, to young.
PiranhaMaster Feb 9 2004, 10:45 AM
Well at this stage I obviously disagree with Frank but he is the resident expert on this so I would assume him to be correct if I were you. Just note my opinion and we will see as it developes. I have 6 rhom varients all at 3-4" now but started at 2" and none of them share the look of your fish. As I said there are many varients so it could be but time will tell. As of now I would say.
hastatus Feb 9 2004, 10:59 AM
Enjoy: Photo taken from Schulte Piranhas in the Aquarium. Photo by H.R. Axelrod.
I don't have juvenile photos available of similar S. rhombeus "appearance". But you'll just have to take my word for it.
PiranhaMaster Feb 9 2004, 11:04 AM
I am very familiar with this pic and it looks nothing like this fish in question except for the size of it's spots and that is not a definitive characteristic. Again it is way to small to even begin a debate on but I would have to agree to disagree at this point.
QUOTE
PiranhaMaster Posted on Feb 9 2004, 06:04 PM
I am very familiar with this pic and it looks nothing like this fish in question except for the size of it's spots and that is not a definitive characteristic. Again it is way to small to even begin a debate on but I would have to agree to disagree at this point.
hastatus Feb 9 2004, 11:07 AM
Let's hope the fish lives long and propers to void this debate eh?
hastatus Feb 9 2004, 11:19 AM
QUOTE
PiranhaMaster Posted on Feb 9 2004, 06:15 PM
Eye, Snout, Tail, Head are all very different
PiranhaMaster Posted on Feb 9 2004, 06:14 PM
I agree. I just made this for a quick comparison. Not trying to drag out this topic any longer though.
Understand. Welcome to growth morphology studies.
QUOTE
phil Posted on Feb 9 2004, 08:59 PM
doesn'tlook like a rhom to me, it has large eyes,a nd a rounded nose, as Piranha Master pointed out
hastatus Feb 9 2004, 02:57 PM
What is not pointed out is the fish image was taken at a slight angle giving the nose that appearance. Which is why I have pinned that fish photos should be angle-free and flank photos only without deviation to avoid false positives for ID. I'll see if I can find the image of my own S. rhombeus that is identicle to the one shown by Chad_linden. As I said, we all can argue pro and con on this ID. Ultimately when the fish grows out then the proper ID will be made.
alot of juvi rhoms have red finscompton ass steve said:hmm...never seen a rhom with red fins
[snapback]850139[/snapback]