Piranhas Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 67 Posts

·
Got Rice?!?
Joined
·
2,648 Posts
Very close to porn. Nice pic, however I wonder what the rest of the staff think. I already told him to change his previous one that was definately porn. I guess I cant really talk though.

~Dj
 

·
.pocketful of sunshine.
Joined
·
16,830 Posts
InSinUAsian said:
Very close to porn. Nice pic, however I wonder what the rest of the staff think. I already told him to change his previous one that was definately porn. I guess I cant really talk though.

~Dj
His avatar is pushing it this time... as well are others...

Just dont abuse your privledge of having avatars guys...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,330 Posts
Very close to porn. Nice pic, however I wonder what the rest of the staff think. I already told him to change his previous one that was definately porn. I guess I cant really talk though.
I made sure it doesn't show anything. Thanks to everyone who likes it.
 

·
Dodge City
Joined
·
10,070 Posts
Lucky Luciano said:
Very close to porn. Nice pic, however I wonder what the rest of the staff think. I already told him to change his previous one that was definately porn. I guess I cant really talk though.
I made sure it doesn't show anything. Thanks to everyone who likes it.
Yeah , All Canadian Nurses dress like that .

Man, You Americans really gotta relax.lol
 

·
.pocketful of sunshine.
Joined
·
16,830 Posts
winkyee said:
Yeah , All Canadian Nurses dress like that .

Man, You Americans really gotta relax.lol
I honestly could care less about what anyone has as their avatar, but it is the rules of the board due to its young viewers.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,531 Posts
keep the Avtar! It's awesome. Cmon, why are kids on this site? Piranha's... The stuff the kids see with them is far more "intense" then Luciano's pic. IT's only a SCANTILY clad women, I saw nudey mags when I was 8. And if anyone is younger than that or around that age 1) They shouldn't be here, grow up some then come back and 2) What are there parents doing. Monitor you damn internet, and you damn kids. Don't punish the ADULTS.
 

·
.pocketful of sunshine.
Joined
·
16,830 Posts
P45- How do you know if no one here is younger than 13? Some members choose to keep that info private. Anyways about the porn issue, this site is not blocked by parental controls like porn sites are.
 

·
reasonably awesome
Joined
·
7,613 Posts
Ms_Nattereri said:
P45- How do you know if no one here is younger than 13? Some members choose to keep that info private. Anyways about the porn issue, this site is not blocked by parental controls like porn sites are.
I know from personal experience-- and im sure most of the other males on the forum would agree-- that in 3rd/4th grades, at age 8-10 or so, they too had a sex drive even though puberty had not occurred yet.

And if there is still say, some minuscule number of child viewers on the site, its either a case of the majority of the older group making a sacrifice for them by censoring everything, or the minority "suffering" (yeah right) for the sake of the majority. I don't see why the majority should have to make sacrifices for the mental well-being of a tiny number of parents.
Of course, the latter paragraph is only my two cents on the subject, but I figure that since the oppurtunity is available, I'd like to speak my mind on the matter.
 

·
G'Dam Mudda Fokka
Joined
·
3,217 Posts
P45 that still doesn't mean that their parents would be happy w/them viewing things such as LL's avatar. They would allow P-Fury to be seen due to the educational nature of the sight, but may change their mind because of the avatars. I know, I know, it does say Viewer Discretion is Advised, but in the rules, it also states that porn is not allowed. His avatar is borderline.

I dont like it.
 

·
reasonably awesome
Joined
·
7,613 Posts
so now your saying pfury is censored to appease to parents. Why the hell do we need to satisfy parents? It isn't hurting the kids any, its the parents that are screwed up, because they are acting under the Traditionally-Accepted-but-Utterly-Baseless Principle that Pornography Is Bad for Kids.

Rather than let their kids experience and come to grips with their bodily urges, parents seek to stifle them. God only knows why


And regardless, WHO CARES if parents don't let their kids visit this site? It's perfectly reasonable to assume that the # of members who visit the site (let alone the number of members who actually POST) that are under 13 is NON-EXISTENT, or terribly close to it.

And OF COURSE you and Ms Natt don't like the image, being females and thereby disliking porn in general.
 

·
.pocketful of sunshine.
Joined
·
16,830 Posts
Forum Rules said:
2. No porn. This goes for avatars, signatures, posted images, etc. You guys know what is appropriate. Just keep it clean and there will be no problems.
Speaks for itself...
 

·
reasonably awesome
Joined
·
7,613 Posts
Then I am Arguing for the Abolishment of that rule

Hear the arguments for/against this rule, admins, and pass judgement.

Note that I'm not arguing that we can turn this place into a porn-site, but I am saying that the wants of a few should not outweigh the wants of many, especially when the few are likely NON-EXISTENT.

And that essentially, this rule seeks enforcement on the behalf of 2 females and a banana
 
1 - 20 of 67 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top