thanks for doing the homework for us innesXenon said:Great info Innes.![]()
They are not closely related. Tambagui (the correct name) are homogenous and form a group that is far older than the piranas. For more information read:they might look kind of the same, but they are differant species (closely related though)
I ment close as in not completly differant. i.e. a cichlid or a shark or a buffalo or somrthing, not that a pacu is a pygo or any kind of piranha.hastatus said:They are not closely related. Tambagui (the correct name) are homogenous and form a group that is far older than the piranas. For more information read:they might look kind of the same, but they are differant species (closely related though)
Tambaqui, Silver Dollars, Pacu
Like you being a vegetarian Innes.Innes said:they might look kind of the same, but they are differant species (closely related though)
Red belly Pacus and black pacus get way bigger than piranhas, and do not have such large, powerfull lower jaws, but this does not mean they don't eat feeders.
often described as vegetarian, it is not, it just eats more vegetation than piranhas
Red belly pacu link
Black pacu link
Red belly pacu link 2
Red belly piranha link
I ampcrose said:Like you being a vegetarian Innes.Innes said:they might look kind of the same, but they are differant species (closely related though)
Red belly Pacus and black pacus get way bigger than piranhas, and do not have such large, powerfull lower jaws, but this does not mean they don't eat feeders.
often described as vegetarian, it is not, it just eats more vegetation than piranhas
Red belly pacu link
Black pacu link
Red belly pacu link 2
Red belly piranha link
I'm not sure I understand your remark. If you mean tambaqui look physically similar than I agree, same ways the silver dollar looks similar and so do certain characins (tetras) to piranas. But if you are infering genetics, they are not close at all in relation to each other. Only Metynnis and Catoprion are closely related.Innes Posted on Mar 29 2003, 03:45 AM
I ment close as in not completly differant. i.e. a cichlid or a shark or a buffalo or somrthing, not that a pacu is a pygo or any kind of piranha.
sorry if I was misleading.
I'm sorry Frank, I was not talking genetics as that is way to advanced for me.hastatus said:I'm not sure I understand your remark. If you mean tambaqui look physically similar than I agree, same ways the silver dollar looks similar and so do certain characins (tetras) to piranas. But if you are infering genetics, they are not close at all in relation to each other. Only Metynnis and Catoprion are closely related.Innes Posted on Mar 29 2003, 03:45 AM
I ment close as in not completly differant. i.e. a cichlid or a shark or a buffalo or somrthing, not that a pacu is a pygo or any kind of piranha.
sorry if I was misleading.
Unscientifically, tambaqui's are called cousins not sisters as some have infered. But I'm not sure even that statement is accurate given what we know today.
Hey Innes we all know what you meant... and its great info, no worries nowInnes said:I was only trying to help*feeling really stupid now*![]()
Dont be so hard on yourself Innes, we all appreciate your info! :smile:Innes said:I'm sorry Frank, I was not talking genetics as that is way to advanced for me.hastatus said:I'm not sure I understand your remark. If you mean tambaqui look physically similar than I agree, same ways the silver dollar looks similar and so do certain characins (tetras) to piranas. But if you are infering genetics, they are not close at all in relation to each other. Only Metynnis and Catoprion are closely related.Innes Posted on Mar 29 2003, 03:45 AM
I ment close as in not completly differant. i.e. a cichlid or a shark or a buffalo or somrthing, not that a pacu is a pygo or any kind of piranha.
sorry if I was misleading.
Unscientifically, tambaqui's are called cousins not sisters as some have infered. But I'm not sure even that statement is accurate given what we know today.
I was just talking from my view of them, I know they are not super closely related, but as you said
"Unscientifically, tambaqui's are called cousins not sisters as some have infered."
I was only trying to help*feeling really stupid now*![]()
No reason to feel stupid. I was simply trying to understand what it was you were saying. I know you do not know genetics, I'm not that well versed in it myself since much has changed over the last few years since my hiatus. This is simply an exchange of ideas and information. Nothing to be taken personally by you or anyone else.Innes Posted on Mar 29 2003, 03:59 AM ...I was only trying to help *feeling really stupid now*
Yeah that would be very helpful to the board and then it would save a lot of questions from the newbies. It would be nice to know the difference myself I know some of the differences but I would like to learn more.Innes said:I understand.
Frank - did you get those scientific names I sent you?
can you explain to me which ones are correct for the differant types of pacu?
Xenon - what do you say about adding pacus, silver dollers, wimple piranhas and other "nearly a piranha" type fish to the factsheets with explinations of the differances between them and true piranhas?
I finally sat down and read that PM, my apologies for not responding, since I do get many offline PM and just quickly read it. In this case, I saw this post here and partially read your PM, hence my replying here instead.Frank - did you get those scientific names I sent you?
can you explain to me which ones are correct for the differant types of pacu?