MOST AGGRESSIVE FISH to satiate the masses...
Posted 17 February 2007 - 04:45 AM (#82)
acestro, on Feb 12 2005, 09:51 PM, said:
Hi everybody. I'm MarkJ and this is my first ever post. I've been reading you guys for a while and I finally found a reason to log in as a member. I gotta be upfront and tell you that I don't own, nor have I ever owned an aggressive fish. I don't like killing and all that but even as an animal pacifist, I gotta admit, I'm intrigued as chit.
I'm an independent filmmaker from Portland Oregon and I wrote a script revolving around a tank with aggressive fish inside. I know everthing in the script is doable I just need the right fish.
I've read all your takes on which fish is the baddest and it doesn't seem like there was ever a consensus. In fact, I think there were about a hundred different chosen, Jesoos. So somebody start a poll on the baddest of them all. Choose five and we'll all vote. We'll name the King of underwater jungle. Take everything into accout EXCEPT SIZE. I'm talking about verocity, intelligence, protective instinct, meanness...we're looking for the pound for pound greatest of all time. The Sugar Ray Robinson of fish.
If somebody has already suggested this, I apologize. Just another newby spouting off. I wanna know who's the baddest mothertrucker of them all. Let's put it to a vote. MJ.
P. S. If there's any collectors in Portland, I need a location. One day shoot. Be part of something, something that I believe could be great. None of this 1979 "Pirahna" Bullshit, I'm talking about showing exactly what these fish are capable. Watching their masters, butting the glass, coming out of the water to feed on fingers. That kinda chit. Thanx.
Posted 17 February 2007 - 04:53 AM (#83)
MarkJ, on Feb 17 2007, 04:45 AM, said:
acestro, on Feb 12 2005, 09:51 PM, said:
Hi everybody. I'm MarkJ and this is my first ever post. I've been reading you guys for a while and I finally found a reason to log in as a member. I gotta be upfront and tell you that I don't own, nor have I ever owned an aggressive fish. I don't like killing and all that but even as an animal pacifist, I gotta admit, I'm intrigued as chit.
I'm an independent filmmaker from Portland Oregon and I wrote a script revolving around a tank with aggressive fish inside. I know everthing in the script is doable I just need the right fish.
I've read all your takes on which fish is the baddest and it doesn't seem like there was ever a consensus. In fact, I think there were about a hundred different chosen, Jesoos. So somebody start a poll on the baddest of them all. Choose five and we'll all vote. We'll name the King of underwater jungle. Take everything into accout EXCEPT SIZE. I'm talking about verocity, intelligence, protective instinct, meanness...we're looking for the pound for pound greatest of all time. The Sugar Ray Robinson of fish.
If somebody has already suggested this, I apologize. Just another newby spouting off. I wanna know who's the baddest mothertrucker of them all. Let's put it to a vote. MJ.
P. S. If there's any collectors in Portland, I need a location. One day shoot. Be part of something, something that I believe could be great. None of this 1979 "Pirahna" Bullshit, I'm talking about showing exactly what these fish are capable of. Watching their masters, butting the glass, coming out of the water to feed on fingers. That kinda chit. Thanx.
This post has been edited by MarkJ: 17 February 2007 - 04:53 AM
Posted 03 September 2007 - 01:36 PM (#85)
Posted 12 November 2007 - 12:23 AM (#86)
#revolution
Posted 18 December 2008 - 10:32 AM (#87)
the great white shark...
Posted 30 December 2008 - 01:11 AM (#88)
This post has been edited by speakyourmind: 03 October 2009 - 02:45 AM
Posted 09 November 2010 - 08:26 AM (#89)
This post has been edited by RHOM: 09 November 2010 - 08:29 AM
Posted 13 April 2011 - 03:48 PM (#90)
#revolution
Posted 19 September 2011 - 04:21 PM (#92)
the most intimidating, ferocious large fish however is The Bull Shark.


This post has been edited by amazonjungle: 19 September 2011 - 04:21 PM
AJ



Posted 19 September 2011 - 05:24 PM (#93)
good point above. size doesnt mean everything.
i gotta think it through. i think i answered a long time ago already but this is a stumpin me. hmmmmmmm
#revolution
Posted 20 September 2011 - 09:35 AM (#95)
Central, on 19 September 2011 - 05:24 PM, said:
good point above. size doesnt mean everything.
i gotta think it through. i think i answered a long time ago already but this is a stumpin me. hmmmmmmm
Think REALLY small dude. you may find an answer better than mine.
AJ


