Flowerhorns good or bad? Have we had this discussion?
Posted 17 January 2004 - 06:09 PM (#1)
I see multiple sides to this flowerhorn situation.
From loss of interest in the real species
to more colorful fish
to less pressure on wild populations
to their culls being introduced into the wild in places
yadda yadda yadda...
....there's a lot to discuss that we really have only sporadically done.
I would also hope that any arguments in other threads could link to this thread instead of repeating themselves and derailing good cichlid/flowerhorn discussions.
Your hybrid thoughts?...
(No bashing here, please, I know there have been some strong feelings about this in the past)
Posted 17 January 2004 - 06:12 PM (#2)
Posted 17 January 2004 - 06:19 PM (#3)
a bit of confusion about the ethics (the tailless fish, etc.) that
don't apply to all breeders that could be discussed in detail.
It's okay to glorify these guys or say you hate hybrids, feel
free to opinionate!
Posted 17 January 2004 - 06:35 PM (#4)
Posted 17 January 2004 - 06:42 PM (#5)
There are many fish that can hybridize together. This can be achieved with varios cichlids. If you were to breed a trimac with a midas is it a flowerhorn? no its not. The process of making these fish took many years. With very few exception, the only types of flowehorn being sold in any lfs nationwide were bred by a hobbyist in their basement. When this type of breeding is done by hobbyist they sell the entire stock of fry. This dumping is similiar to what almost killed the hobby in asia. Males that are used in breeding are of a quality that is unimaginable as far as the color, markings and shape. People think that the fish they buy for $30 is going to look just like this when that is not the case at all. Its the greedy people who dont love the fish for what they are and only care about the profit that use a fancy name and a picture to sell a fish that will never look anything like the one shown.
To combay this flowehornusa was created, which is an organization of sellers that are held to the highest ethical standards. We are trying to get the message out to people who are intrested in the fish that if they want to save the hassle of being ripped off and disapointed, dont make the mistake of going to counterfeit sellers. We have a list of sellers that are commiting fish fraud on the website.
Generally the practice is to sell fish at a size no smaller then 3". This is because the plum markings on the fish fade as the fish reaches this size. At a young age they all appear like they have AAA grade markings. If the fish doesnt have the marks to the gill plate when its 3" or it doesnt have anything else that stands out about it then its simple not woth growing out.
The flowerhorn is a Feng Shui fish because it represents the power of mountains in its might head. There are various points of the fish that should be present. It has now become the good luck fish for the next period of 20 years because of the increasing rarity of the asian arowana.
In order to isolate the traits that people find desirable ill go through the process that i plan on goign through when i being breeing
After the fry are born they will be put into dark 300 gallon ponds and grown out to a size of .5". At this size ill use jewelers glasses to vent the fish and toss all the females i can identify unless they are spectatuclar.. those extra nices ones will be moved to a seperate tank. All males that are not up to par will be tossed as well. The rest will be grown out another inch and checked again. The process repeats itself untill a group of 10 or fewer specimens is left out of the 2000 that were born. The 10 remaining are now ready to be sold in the $200-500 range depending on the quality. Quality pricing speaks for itself. A fish doesnt cost $1000 because its a rip off price.. it costs that much because out of 10,000 some fry born its the only one that is that nice.
Posted 17 January 2004 - 11:40 PM (#6)
Kevin
Posted 18 January 2004 - 07:06 PM (#7)
but if you cant get one then you have to not like all of the people who have them
weird huh
but i think that there are more pov's then neg's
30g-1 Rhom
10g-1 Arrowhead Pufferfish
Posted 18 January 2004 - 07:13 PM (#8)
I like flowerhorns. I am an ardent supporter of Flowerhorns, even though I have a mutt and not a high grade FH. However, I have to agree with p45. Fh's like mine do dilute the Trimac gene pool thus slowly ebbing out an entire species. To me, all things should be done in moderation. Extremes are bad...extreme heat and extreme cold can hhurt a person and extreme breeding can hurt a population of fish. I know I'm not presenting my view very clearly due to the medicine(non drowsy my ass) but to sum it up I believe that although flowerhorns are a bautiful fish, they should be bred in moderation or rather in periods. Perhaps the first six months of a year FH's are bred and the trimacs and other cichlids used to breed them should be let go into the world to re populate the wild then after this six month period perhaps you can capture some more cichlids and repaeating the cycle...I dunno, that's just me though.
Posted 19 January 2004 - 01:36 AM (#9)
If you want to try breeding on your own, thats fine.. but unless you are in a position were you can actually make something good, plan on keeping them all to yourself and killing the rest.
Posted 19 January 2004 - 05:01 AM (#11)
My Gallery *** My Around The World Travel Diary *** DIY Piranha Food


Posted 19 January 2004 - 10:40 AM (#12)
Posted 19 January 2004 - 01:59 PM (#13)
I'm not a big fan of hybrids as a rule, to be honest. The hybrid peacock cichlids from malawi (not the peacock bass) are a shame considering the amazing natural kinds.
I don't know about the muscle analogy
As for what exactly a flowerhorn is, that still seems a bit confusing. Is it the number of these "flowers"? The nuchal hump? The exact mix of species put into this equation? Is there a true breeding line? Isn't some of the 'looks' environmentally produced as opposed to the genes? Also, is there any messing around with hormoned up fish in this? Seems possible.
And what is the big deal with charging a lot for the best of a brood when CA cichlid broods are typically in the hundreds or even thousands? Many people who breed these cichlids are very frustrated at what to do with so many fry anyway!
The best point made is the release of interest in the Asian Aro, hope that keeps up. If that makes enough of a difference, hell, I may even think of getting a FH!
Posted 19 January 2004 - 02:14 PM (#14)
I went into the pricing. If you searched every corner of the country you couldnt find one Pearls of the Orient that looked like the red on i have, nor could you possibly breed one without investing 1000s of hours and more money then you can imagine. Its just like with asian arowana. FHs do not breed true at all, and it you try to breed two together of the same breed then they turn out awful. Rarity dicates the pricing. Its just like art collecting.
This post has been edited by Poseidon X: 19 January 2004 - 02:15 PM
Posted 19 January 2004 - 02:25 PM (#15)
There's no crossing back? Also, are their better fry from an impressive male and a healthy female or is it just as likely to get a nice fish from any old combination?
Posted 19 January 2004 - 02:31 PM (#16)
This is why the quality of Zhen Zhous went down hill, which resulted in crossing ZZs with King Kong parrots. This also makes the males sterile. So close to 75% of male kamfa flowerhorn are sterile, so finding a breeder is super rare now, but their average quality is much much higher as they almost all get huge heads.
Posted 19 January 2004 - 03:24 PM (#17)
How many more deformities are seen in these broods (than, say, a wild Trimac brood)? Is it ethical to even try an breed something where you'll have so many deformed fishes?
Also, how can you combine strains if you can't have a strain to begin with? If you can't cross back within one genetic lineage you can never have a strain. What am I missing here? There must be crossing back to create these strains.
Posted 19 January 2004 - 07:04 PM (#18)
Posted 20 January 2004 - 03:08 PM (#19)
I'm guessing 'wrap tails' is a good thing (tails extending high and low?)
I'm also guessing that there has to be crossing back to create and maintain any strain.
I'd also guess that (and this is normal for any specialty fish) culls are fed to a monster fish or humanely destroyed (still sad! ).
My last guess; there are more deformities with these lineages.
Catch me where I'm wrong. That is interesting where the shape comes from.
Posted 21 January 2004 - 11:15 AM (#20)
Normally farms take the fry and place them in lite saltwater and freeze them to kille them slow and painfully.
Strains are nearly impossible to replicate.. once that particular breeding pair is gone its gone completely. If you look at the little genie pictures at fhusa, you can see that almost everyone is unique. The parents are both flawless in ever regard, so it doesnt matter which of the parents traits they inherit.. So there is alot of variety with those fish. Some strains are more stable then others. Ill post the yellow rainbow dragon im picking up today, to my knowledge only, 1% of all the rainbow dragons that are good enough to sell are inheriting this yellow base color that the father has. I believe the process that Flowerfish uses is to cross a new female that is incredible back to her father.. or grandfather to stabalize a strain, but you cant keep doing this. So its very important to keep the lineage of these fish when breeding.
i already have a couple males to breed and just need a female from completely different strains. When they breed, i have an image in my mind what traits of each fish i want the new fry to inherit. I will only select those fish which have those traits, unless another really stands out to me. So its more like manual standaridization. It is not easy, and takes tons of land and employees to do this. 50,000 fry must be raised to produce maybe 800 fish

Help
Info
Videos

Blue
Green
Red
Black

















